Media as a View of Politics

Specifically, Froomkin argued that the give-and-take media had become overly afraid of appearing partisan or adversarial. As a result, he believed that diarists failed in their obligations to ask important, probing questions. As a result, journalists allowed political partisans to introduce falsehoods into media cycles and to "stage-manage" the give-and-take (Froomkin 1).

Political columnist Edward Wasserman in addition agrees that the mainstream media have abdicated their responsibility to set the national intelligence operation agenda (1). He notes that political partisans, both Republican and pop, drove the agenda during the recent presidential campaign. For example, he notes that the media did not report soberly on anti-war takingss until former Vermont Governor Dr. Howard Dean made the issue a presidential campaign issue (Wasserman 1). Wasserman in like manner points to the remarkable effect of the swift boat group's attacks on Senator John Kerry's Vietnam fight service. Wasserman believes that politicos with money set the intelligence service agenda today, rather than the news media's sense of obligation to cover events and issues of importance to the country (Wasserman 1).

doubting Thomas Lang, writing for the Campaign Desk of the Columbia Journalism Review, also demonstrates how the news media has come to rely upon political operatives for their news. Lang relates the case of an Associated Press journalist who reported a "Republican talking point" that Kerry had voted for high taxes 350 times in his Senate career. Raum also

some other significant event in the development of politics and the news media has been the rise of the twenty-four hour cable news network. These networks acquire to fill an entire day's programming with news, but they are also driven by ratings, which determine their advertising rates.

The result is ofttimes very sensationalized news that is more interested in familial the viewer's attention, for whatever reason, rather than educating the viewer on non-sensational events and issues that are notwithstanding important to the country as a whole (Modic 12).

Froomkin, Dan. " remark: Tougher Political Coverage Needed - But Does It Mean an closedown to Impartiality?" Nieman Watchdog Online. 8 November 2004. . [16 November 2004].

reported a Democratic talking point that the Bush-Cheney economic plan had bewildered 3 million jobs (Lang 1). Lang notes that the journalist could easily have used net income sources to discover that the 350 times statistic was distorted and that only 2.3 million jobs had been lost under President Bush at the time of the bind (Lang 1). Moreover, Tim Rutten of the Los Angeles Times and the Christian Science Monitor also argued that the news media demonstrated their lack of will to fulfill their obligation to symbolize in the public interest when they chose not to offer " solemn coverage"
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.