Political Science

Securing Our Right to TradeThe Islamic Republic of Iran , since the revolution in the mid-seventies , has been met with fierce opposition and bloody intrigue by divers(prenominal) foreign nations , particularly the manhood s that superpower and fountainhead of imperialism - the unite States . Not only have the world s policymakers earnestly criticized Iranian foreign policy but it also include scores of Western academics and intellectuals who continue a strong manor h exclusively in every US organization to pressure governments and supranational organizations to severely sanction Iran and cripple its softwood - force the changing of its foreign policy opposed to US and Western interests still the great Islamic Republic will never alkali down to the forces of US imperialism despite all its pressures and threats to Iran and the international community of interests , especially in the wake of the nuclear stand-off , in which the United States continues to insist that our right to produce nuclear energy is only but a mere ruse to pursue and increase nuclear weapons . Discussions on these issues are critical in contemplating the pot policy of the Islamic Republic in to fully witness the reasons for its perceived dogmatism and hostility towards fully understanding its power in international trade and diplomacyWestern Barrage for SanctionsThe history of the world is replete with instances where the United States intervened in the foreign policy of states and governments hostile to its interests in terms of geopolitical and economic spread all over the world . There can be no better example for such a policy by the United States than the almost half a century trade embargo in socialist Cuba , in the guise of the poor Caribbean nation s perceived threats to the US mainland . On the other business deal , Iran is never spared from the crosshairs of US propaganda as the primary threat to US interests in the Middle East especially in the mise en scene of the Islamic state being a haven of Muslim fundamentalists and even state sponsoring terrorist groups .

Prior to the current Bush administration , such a militarist mindset was already permeating -The DCP , more accurately described as the Iran Containment Policy , calls for corporal economic action against the Islamic Republic of Iran . It represents a hardened effort to embargo Iran into ever-worsening poverty unless it alters its destabilizing , often terrorist , foreign policies . The DCP is uppercase s most coherent attempt to establish a conception for coping with Iranian Islamic militancy . It is important and then to consider whether that American policy will be authentic by the United States allies , who are indispensable to its achiever , and whether it can effectively counter Iran s Islamic radicalsWhile it can be said that Iranian foreign policy may come along to the world as destabilizing , it is all in the interest of nerve-wracking to protect the state and its people from foreign intervention on all fronts and safeguard the Islamic revolution . More so , it can never be said to pursue terrorist foreign policies as not an iota of evidence is present to turn out that Iran indeed harbors...If you want to get a full essay, install it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .