Ethics

Answer:
Alexs is facing with an ethical dilemma as the selling of the cement below the friendships character reference but yet above the industry average. Here, he is dismission through managerial role conflict that is, his mortal moralistic is facing the doubt of being unethical. Since his job is to monitor the standard, so compromising with it means depriving the customers. On disclosing the fact to the chief operating officer of the company, the CEO suggested to sell the cement in the normal price concealment about its quality to the customers.
If I were in his position, I would make water done the same thing as he did. I have my tenablenessing for not protesting and complying with the stopping point of the CEO.
According to Milton and Carr, course has it own ethics and it should be left with its own precept and the principle is to make profit. Throwing the cements would cost the company, and would not benefit the mansion or employees in any way.
Following the stakeholders model, a decision is best when the maximum numbers of stakeholders are being benefited by it. The stakeholders are the company, shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers and society.



Even though the cement is below the companys standard, but yet it is above the industrys average standard, so selling it would not mean to wrong the customers or deprive the customers as well. Other than that, by throwing it all told the stakeholders will have to incur loss.
The most important reason behind the decision would be that, the managers initiatory and vital role is to work for the company, since he is lead offting compensable by the company so his utmost obligation and responsibleness lie in taking the decisions that is most suitable for the company. His individual morals and principles should be set aside and practiceIf you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .