The Consensus Model of Democracy

Ten elements are utilise to describe democracy in these areas, which are in line of products to the ten majoritarian characteristics of the Westminster homunculus. The power reports that the consensus model shares, disperses, and restrains power by methods such(prenominal) as: executive power-sharing in broad coalition cabinets, executive-legislative sense of equilibrium of power, multiparty system, proportional seeation, interest group corporatism, federal and decentralized government, conceptive bicameralism, constitutional rigidity, judicial review, and central bank independence. The European totality is further discussed since principal institutions do not fit the preceding(prenominal) classifications of executive, legislative, judicial, and monetary organs in the same manner as other sovereign states discussed. The author prese

The author makes an important case for the consideration of consensus rather than mass in democracy.

The conundrum that the majority rule does not represent democracy is well noted and supported by the author with examples of the alternative, consensus, a more appropriate representation of democracy. I allot with the arguments presented by the author regarding the need for a consensus to avoid a dictatorship, which would result from a majority ruling. However, while determining that the consensus model offers a more democratic form of government, which is in line of work with the majority rule is an important issue, it is equally important to insure factors leading to one or the other and how to alleviate the problem of majority rule. The subject of inquiry is therefore relevant to the problem, nonetheless it provides only a brief overview.

ts this information with only a few citations from other sources, more information regardin
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.