The term valuate neutrality was used by weber to indicate the necessary objectivity researchers need when investigating problems in the natural sciences. weber even though had introduced the term and recognised a scientific in the engage of sociology, he did non believed that absolute objectivity is attainable.
Weber say that observe neutrality should be the primary aim in sociology but it cannot be obtained since sociology is the study of human behaviors and society thus making it prone to in the flesh(predicate) views and value judgments. He recognized that values would influence the choice of topics for study. The reason for his claim was, sociologists had to choose from the vast knowledge in sociology to be studied. Inevitably, this will result value judgments to be made. Weber also believed that once a topic has been chosen, researchers should be fair game in conducting experiments and proving their theories.
Objectivity means that the conclusions arrived at as the result of question and investigation are independent of the race, colour, creed, occupation, nationality, religion, moral taste perception and governmental predisposition of the investigator. If hi research is truly objective, it is independent of whatsoever subjective elements, any personal desires, that he may have, Bierstedt (1963).
Having said that, one can argue whether it is impossible for sociology to be value unembellished because in order for it to become objective it has to accommodate itself to so many criteria and conditions. It seems as if it is impossible for sociology to be value free since it is the study of humanity and society which of course cannot be freed from making value judgment. How can it be value free if it cannot be independent from bias in race, color, creed, occupation, nationality, religion, moral preference and political standings? Like Weber, Myrdal believed that objectivity is ideal to...
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment